Service Area/Provider-wise Performance of Quality of Service (QoS) for Cellular Mobile in India - Part I (Quarter ending December, 2019) | ||||||||||||
Service Area/City | Service Provider | Network Related Parameters | ||||||||||
Network Availability | Connection Establishment (Accessibility) | Connection Maintenance (Retainability) | Point of Inter- Connection (POI) | Down Link (DL) Packet Drop Rate or DL-PDR | Up Link (UL) Packet Drop Rate or UL-PDR | |||||||
BS Accumulated Downtime (Not Available for Service) (In %age) | Worst Affected BSs due to down-time (In %age) | Call Set-up Success Rate and Session Establishment* (within Licensee`s Own Network) | SDCCH/ Paging Channel Congestion/ RRC Congestion (In %age) | TCH, RAB and E-RAB Congestion (In %age) | Network QoS DCR Spatial Distribution Measure {Network QSD (90,90)} | Network QoS DCR Temporal Distribution Measure {Network QTD(97,90)} | Connections with Good Voice Quality, Circuit Switched Voice Quality and VoLTE Quality | Point of Interconnection (POI) Congestion# (Averaged over a Period of Quarter) | ||||
≤ 2% | ≤ 2% | ≥ 95% | ≤ 1% | ≤ 2% | ≤ 2% | ≤ 3% | ≥ 95% | ≤ 0.5% | ≤ 2% | ≤ 2% | ||
Andhra Pradesh | ||||||||||||
Assam | ||||||||||||
Bihar | ||||||||||||
Delhi | ||||||||||||
Gujarat | ||||||||||||
Haryana | ||||||||||||
Himachal Pradesh | ||||||||||||
Jammu and Kashmir | ||||||||||||
Karnataka | ||||||||||||
Kerala | ||||||||||||
Kolkata | ||||||||||||
Madhya Pradesh | ||||||||||||
Maharashtra | ||||||||||||
Mumbai | ||||||||||||
North East | ||||||||||||
Odisha | ||||||||||||
Punjab | ||||||||||||
Rajasthan | ||||||||||||
Tamil Nadu | ||||||||||||
Uttar Pradesh (East) | ||||||||||||
Uttar Pradesh (West) | ||||||||||||
West Bengal | ||||||||||||